Steve Fernlund and The Long Way Home

Opening another box the other day, the Bohunk found a small treasure from my boyhood that spoke to what was important to me. It is three yellow boxes, two Matchbox Series cars (a Mercedes Coupe and a fire truck), and a Dinky Toys Ford Anglia. The toys are like new, and the boxes are reasonably intact. A quick internet search showed me they were collectible but not expensive.  The memories they brought back are priceless. Cars defined me back then. I constantly surprised my dad when I correctly answered his question, “What kind of car is that?” From Edsels to Town Cars, I could tell the manufacturer, year of production, and other meaningless trivia at a glance. I was fascinated with planes, trains, and automobiles. But cars could take a young man anywhere, at any time. Plus, they were cool. When I was five or six, I had the exhilarating experience of riding in the backseat of my Aunt Vona’s Austin Healy 3000, a moment that fueled my passion for cars. She seemed like the coolest aunt...

I’ve had two lines of thought this week on The Long Way Home. The only thing that ties the two lines together is that they both focus on our country's near-term future.  The first is the role of federal judges in tempering the current and future administrations' excesses. As a baby boomer, I learned about the US government in our Civics class. Remember those? The Constitution created three co-equal branches of our federal government: legislative, executive, and judicial. After living under a regime where the King of England had absolute power through decrees (executive orders) that bypassed the will of his legislators and judiciary, the framers of the Constitution wanted to prevent any branch of the government from accumulating excess power. Since ratified in June of 1788, there has been a constant struggle as one or more branches try to exert more power than the others.  My recollection of the introductory lesson in high school was that the three branches of government were i...

The social media site I like to call the Book of Face helps me learn more about human behavior, and it scares me sometimes. In the age of social media and 24/7 news cycles, constructive dialogue is rare. An insidious tactic on Facebook from all sections of the political spectrum is "whataboutism," a simple rhetorical maneuver that ends any attempt at meaningful discussion. When someone you’re communicating with starts their following sentence, “Yeah, but what about…?” you know the discussion is over. "Whataboutism" is a common rhetorical tactic that involves responding to an accusation or criticism by deflecting it with a counter-accusation, often related to a different issue. It's a way of avoiding the original point, oftentimes because the original point is contrary to what we feel and believe. On St. Patrick’s Recovery Day, I reposted an article on Facebook titled “Minnesota State Sen. Eichorn arrested on suspicion of soliciting a minor.” The post contained a...

Social media taught me that we can hardly expect politicians and their handlers to demonstrate truth and honesty when most of us have a truth and honesty problem of our own. Spin, the antithesis of truth and honesty, runs wild. “Truth" and "honesty" are closely related. Truth refers to a state of being in accordance with facts or reality. It's about what is, regardless of personal beliefs or opinions. A statement is considered valid if it aligns with verifiable evidence. The earth is round, the climate is changing,  and vaccines work. Honesty involves being genuine and sincere in one's words and actions. It's about having integrity and avoiding deception. It emphasizes the intention to be truthful. A person can be honest, believing what they say is the truth while still being wrong. And there’s the rub. People can honestly believe something that is not true. And that’s where social media “discussions” go off track, insults are hurled, and reality is denied.  ...